A Pilot Study of Effects of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program on Phonemic Awareness and Basic Reading Skills

Carolyn M. Casey, Catherine Cook-Cottone, Courtney N. Baker

Abstract


The current pilot study was an investigation into the effectiveness of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program reading curriculum among kindergarten students. Magic Penny was introduced as a supplement to the existing curriculum in the intervention classroom for approximately three months. Reading achievement was assessed using a selection of tests from the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities and the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement that comprise the Basic Reading Skills Cluster and the Phonemic Awareness III Clinical Cluster. Utilizing a between-group comparison and longitudinal study design, group differences between intervention (n = 19) and comparison (n = 19) classrooms on the early literacy outcome measures were examined using linear regression models. Results provided mixed support for the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program. Analyses indicated that intervention group membership was associated with greater improvement in children’s Basic Reading scores, when controlling for pre-test scores. In contrast, intervention group membership was not associated with greater improvement in children’s Phonemic Awareness scores. This study represents the first formal evaluation of the Magic Penny Early Literacy Program. However, this pilot study was limited in scope and lacked random assignment. Given its limitations, additional, larger-scale research is warranted to further examine the impact of this new program.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2003). Put reading first: The research building blocks For teaching children to read: Kindergarten through grade 3(2nd Ed.). National Institute for Literacy. Retrieved from http://nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/PFRbookletBW.pdf

Casey, A., & Howe, K. (2002). Best practices in early literacy skills. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 721-735). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

Dombey, H. (1999). Towards a balanced approach to phonics teaching. Reading, 33(2), 52-58.

Gillon, G. T. (2004). Phonological awareness: From research to practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Houghton Mifflin. (2002). Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.eduplace.com/marketing/nc/pdf/fw_p02-03.pdf

Howell, K. W., Kurns, S., & Antil, L. (2002). Best practices in curriculum-based evaluation. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 753-771). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

Joseph, L. M. (2006). Understanding, assessing, and intervening on reading problems: A guide for school psychologists and other educational consultants. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

Lee, J., Grigg, W. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2007). The nation’s report card: Reading 2007 executive summary. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2007/2007496.asp#pdflist

Mather, N., Wendling, B. J., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Essentials of WJ III tests of achievement assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001a). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement: Examiner’s manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001b). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities: Examiner’s manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

National Early Literacy Panel [NELP]. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Retrieved from http://www.nifl.gov/publications/pdf/NELPReport09.pdf

National Reading Panel [NRP]. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/smallbook_pdf.pdf

The Nation’s Report Card: Reading 2007 State Snapshot Report. (2007). National Center forEducation Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/stt2007/2007497NY4.pdf

New York State Report Cards. (n.d.). New York state testing and accountability reporting tool. Retrieved from https://www.nystart.gov/publicweb/

Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R., & McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development? Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 3-26. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0801_2

Schneider, D., & Schneider, S. (2008). Program assessments. Amherst, NY: Genesee Hearing Services, LLP/Magic Penny Reading.

Schneider, D., & Schneider, S. (2009a). Evidence-based early literacy results: Magic PennyReading [Brochure]. Amherst, NY: Genesee Hearing Services, LLP/Magic Penny Reading.

Schneider, D., & Schneider, S. (2009b). Why does the Magic Penny program work so well? Retrieved from http://magicpennyreading.org/a/why-does-the-magic-penny-program-work-so-well

Schneider, D., & Schneider, S. (n.d.). Magic Penny Early Literacy: Literacy development solutions [Brochure].Amherst, NY: Genesee Hearing Services, LLP/Magic Penny Reading.

Schrank, F. A., Flanagan, D. P., Woodcock, R. W., & Mascolo, J. T. (2002). Essentials of WJ III cognitive abilities assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Schuele, C. M., & Boudreau, D. (2008). Phonological awareness intervention: Beyond the basics. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 3-20. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2008/002)

Sciarrino, M. (2009). My prayers have been answered. Retrieved from http://magicpennyreading.org/a/letter-from-sr-sciarrino

Senechal, M. (2006). The effect of family literacy interventions on children’s acquisition of reading from kindergarten to grade 3. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Shanahan, T. (2006). The shift from polarization in reading: Relying on research rather than compromise. In K. A. Dougherty Stahl & M. C. McKenna (Eds.), Reading research at work: Foundations of effective practice (pp. 76-82). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Solsken, J. W. (1993). Literacy, gender, and work in families and in school. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Stahl, S. A. (2006). Understanding shifts in reading and its instruction. In K. A. Dougherty Stahl & M. C. McKenna (Eds.), Reading research at work: Foundations of effective practice (pp. 45-75). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Stahl, S. A., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Dougherty Stahl, K. A. (2006). Everything you wanted to know about phonics (but were afraid to ask). In K. A. Dougherty Stahl & M. C. McKenna (Eds.), Reading research at work: Foundations of effective practice (pp. 126-154). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Statistical power. Research Methods Knowledge Base. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/power.php

Trochim, W.M.K., & Donnelly, J.P. (2007). The research methods knowledge base. Mason, OH: Thomson.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2002). Guidance for the reading first program. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/guidance.doc

Walpole, S., & McKenna, M. C. (2007). Differentiated reading instruction: Strategies for the primary grades. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001a). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.

Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001b). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 The New School Psychology Bulletin

© The New School Psychology Bulletin | editors@nspb.net