Consent vs. Coercion: BDSM Interactions Highlight a Fine but Immutable Line
In the majority of literature related to Bondage and Domination/Dominance and Submission/ Sadism and Masochism (or Sadomasochism) (BDSM; Connolly, 2006), there exists a focus on the pathologization of such interactions, and little attention is given to a non-clinical BDSM-oriented population. What research there is analyzing non-clinical expressions of BDSM suggests that consensual BDSM interactions can positively influence individuals in various ways, such as through heightened meaning-making and self-awareness and intensified interpersonal connection through a deliberate exchange of power. A closer look at the extant literature discussing nonpathological expressions of BDSM reveals that the explicit communication of consent is paramount. Nonpathological mainstream sexual interaction is based on the construct of consent as well, though consent is often assumed rather than asserted. While the realm of BDSM encompasses a vast range of potential activities, explicit consent is the single universal characteristic in BDSM sexual interactions and is considered a fundamental tenet in the BDSM community. This article presents a review of the literature on BDSM interactions with three goals in mind: 1) to investigate the historical pathologization of BDSM; 2) to compare similarities between BDSM and mainstream sexualities; and 3) to highlight the importance of explicit rather than tacit agreements of consent in every type of sexual interaction.
Alison, L., Santtila, P., Sandnabba, K. N., & Nordling, N. (2001). Sadomasochistically oriented behavior: Diversity in practice and meaning. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1026438422383
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
Barker, M. (2007). The power of play: Healing narratives. In D. Langdridge & M. Barker (Eds.), Safe, sane, and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism (pp. 197–216). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Bauer, R. (2007). Playgrounds and new territories: The potential of BDSM practices to queer genders. In D. Langdridge & M. Barker (Eds.), Safe, sane, and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism (pp. 177–194). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Beckman, A. (2001). Deconstructing myths: The social construction of “sadomasochism” versus “subjugated knowledges” of practitioners of consensual “SM.” Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 8(2), 66–95. Retrieved from http://www.albany.edu/scj/jcjpc/vol8is2/beckmann.html
Beres, M. A. (2007). ‘Spontaneous’ sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature. Feminism & Psychology, 17(1), 93–108. doi: 10.1177/0959353507072914
Connolly, P. H. (2006). Psychological functioning of bondage/domination/sadomasochism (BDSM) practitioners. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 18(1), 79–120. doi: 10.1300/J056v18n01_05
Critelli, J. W. & Bivona, J. M. (2008). Women’s erotic rape fantasies: An evaluation of theory and research. The Journal of Sex Research, 45(1), 57–70. doi: 10.1080/00224490701808191
Cross, P. A. & Matheson, K. (2006). Understanding sadomasochism: An empirical examination of four perspectives. Journal of Homosexuality, 50(2/3), 133–166. doi: 10.1300 /J082v50n02_07
Drescher, J. (2010). Queer diagnoses: Parallels and contrasts in the history of homosexuality, gender variance, and the diagnostic and statistical manual. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(2), 427–460. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9531-5
Hawley, P. H. & Hensley, W. A. (2009). Social dominance and forceful submission fantasies: Feminine pathology or power? The Journal of Sex Research, 46(6), 568–585. doi: 10.1080/00224490902878985
Kleinplatz, P. J. & Moser, C. (2007). Speaking the unspeakable: S/M and the eroticization of pain. In D. Langdridge & M. Barker (Eds.), Safe, sane, and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism (pp. 85–97). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Langdridge, D. (2006). Voices from the margins: Sadomasochism and sexual citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 10(4), 373–389. doi: 10.1080/13621020600857940
Langdridge, D. (2007). Speaking the unspeakable: S/M and the eroticization of pain. In D. Langdridge & M. Barker (Eds.), Safe, sane, and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism (pp. 85-97). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2006). Why questionable psychological tests remain popular. The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine, 10(2), 6–15.
Moser, C. & Kleinplatz, P. J. (2007). Themes of SM expression. In D. Langdridge & M. Barker (Eds.), Safe, sane, and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism (pp. 35–54). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Resick, P. A. (1993). The psychological impact of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8(2), 223–255. doi: 10.1177/088626093008002005
Reiersøl, O. & Skeid, S. (2006). The ICD diagnosis of fetishism and sadomasochism. Journal of Homosexuality, 50(2–3), 243–262. doi:10.1300/J082v50n02_12
Sagarin, B. J., Cutler, B., Cutler, N., Lawler-Sagarin, K. A., & Matuszewich, L. (2009). Hormonal changes and couple bonding in consensual sadomasochistic activity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 186–200. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9374-5
Sandnabba, K. N., Santtila, P., Alison, L., & Nordling, N. (2002). Demographics, sexual behavior, family background and abuse experiences of practitioners of sadomasochistic sex: A review of recent research. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 17(1), 39–55.
Santtila, P., Sandnabba, K. N., Alison, L., & Nordling, N. (2002). Investigating the underlying structure in sadomasochistically oriented behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(2), 185–196.
Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, G. W. & Ussher, J. M. (2001). Making sense of S&M: A discourse analytic account. Sexualities, 4(3), 293–314. doi: 10.1177/136346001004003002
Weinberg, M., Williams, C., & Moser, C. (1984). The social constituents of sadomasochism. Social Problems, 31, 379–389. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/800385
Weait, M. (2007). Sadomasochism and the law. In D. Langdridge & M. Barker (Eds.), Safe, sane, and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism (pp. 63–82). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Yost, M. R. (2007). Sexual fantasies of SM practitioners. In D. Langdridge & M. Barker (Eds.), Safe, sane, and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism (pp. 135–154). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Yost, M. R. (2010). Development and validation of the attitudes about sadomasochism scale. Journal of Sex Research, 47(1), 79–91.
Zurbriggen, E. L. (2000). Social motives and cognitive power–sex associations: Predictors of aggressive sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 559–581. doi: 10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.119
Zurbriggen, E. L. & Yost, M. R. (2004). Power, desire, and pleasure in sexual fantasies. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 288–300. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552236
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 The New School Psychology Bulletin
© The New School Psychology Bulletin | email@example.com