Is it Possible to Appear Less Lazy? Disclaimer Efficacy in Social Interaction

  • Natasha N. Riard Monash University
  • Max Jory Monash University


This study investigated the effectiveness of a laziness disclaimer in forestalling negative impressions, as well as the underlying mechanisms behind disclaimer backfiring. A sample of 180 primarily Asian participants completed questionnaires that assessed the effects of disclaimer use on laziness perceptions, liking, and general positive impressions, as well as three mechanisms (priming, thought suppression rebound, and confirmation bias) that could explain disclaimer inefficacy. The laziness disclaimer had no significant effects on perceptions of laziness, suggesting that disclaimers may not actually forestall negative retypification. Furthermore, disclaimer use, compared to no disclaimer use, had significant negative effects on liking and other positive impressions when it preceded a subsequent lazy statement. Confirmation bias most strongly explained why disclaimers do not work. The results of this study suggest that disclaimers do not fulfill their intended purpose of preventing negative perceptions because they provide trait information that enables individuals to make shortcuts to impression-formation.


Bell, R. A., Zahn, C. J., & Hopper, R. (1984). Disclaiming: A test of two competing views. Communication Quarterly, 32, 28-36.

Bradley, P. H. (1981). The folk-linguistics of women’s speech: An empirical examination. Communication Monographs, 48, 73-90. doi:10.1080/03637758109376048

Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process of impression formation. In T. Srull & R. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Condor, L., Figgou, S., Abell, J., Gibson, S., & Stevenson, S. (2006). ‘They’re not racist...’ Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 441-462. doi:10.1348/014466605X66817

El-Alayli, A., Myers, C. J., Pertersen, T. L., & Lystad, A. L. (2008). “I don’t mean to sound arrogant, but…” The effects of using disclaimers on person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 130-143. doi:10.1177/0146167207309200

Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 915-981). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press

Galasiska, A., & Galasiski, D. (2003). Discursive strategies for coping with sensitive topics of the other. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29, 849-863. doi:10.1080/1369183032000149604

Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers as aligning actions preserving situational definitions in the face of disruptive lines of conduct. American Sociological Review, 40, 1-11. doi:10.2307/2094442

Hill, C., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2008). The role of confirmation bias in suspect interviews: A systematic evaluation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 357-371. doi:10.1348/135532507X238682

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Isbell, L. M., Smith, H. L., & Wyer, R. S. Jr. (1998). Consequences of attempts to disregard social information. In. J.M. Golding & C.M. Macleod, International forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp.289-320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.808

McLaughlin, M. (1984). Conversation: How talk is organized. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (2001). Formulaic disclaimers. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 45-60. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00125-3

Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3

Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1998). Social psychology across cultures (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall Europe.

Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (2000). The impact of opposites: Implications of trait preferences and their antonyms for person judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 439-464. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1410

Stapel, D. A., Koomen, W., & van der Pligt, J. (1997). Categories of category accessibility: The impact of trait concept versus exemplar priming on person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 47-76. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1311

Strauss, C. (2004). Cultural standing in expression of opinion. Language in Society, 33, 161-194. doi:10.1017/S004740450433201X

Tsui, A. (1994). English conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

van Dijk, T. A. (1992).Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3, 87-118. doi:10.1177/0957926592003001005

von Hippel, W., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Vargas, P. (1995). On the role of encoding processes in stereotype maintenance. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 177-254). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5-13. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5

Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Knutson, B., & McMahon, S. R. (1991). Polluting the stream of consciousness: The effect of thought suppression on the mind’s environment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15, 141-152. doi:10.1007/BF01173204

Wegner, D. M., Shortt, J. W., Blake, A. W., & Page, M. S. (1990). The suppression of exciting thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 409-418. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.409